Bicycle crashes in Boston and surrounding cities such as Cambridge happen all too often, sadly resulting in serious personal injury or death. When a person is gravely injured or killed in a bike crash, there will be direct actions that can be filed by the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s estate, but there will also be potential claims if the plaintiff had a surviving spouse.
One of these claims by the surviving spouse is known as loss of consortium. This law, which has been applied in various other states, was addressed in a landmark case in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts entitled Diaz v. Lilly. The tort had been around for a long time at common law, but at common law, there were many ambiguities. In Diaz, the court held that the tort of loss of consortium could be brought as a direct claim. Continue reading
Bike Accident Lawyers Blog


However, as we have more people on bikes, we are seeing more serious, and sometimes fatal, bike crashes involving a collision between a bike and motor vehicle. While we are going to talk about a ways biking can be made safer, as well as things bike riders can do to avoid a collision, it is important to understand that, despite the fact that many motorists, and even police, like to assume the bike rider is at fault, the reality of most of these situations is quite different.
There are a lot of reasons that cities like Boston are interested in making things better for bike riders. One of the reasons is that young professionals who they are trying to get to move back to urban areas are one of the main groups of people who ride bikes. This brings us to another reason why bike riding is good for the community. It is good for the environment as it reduces one’s carbon footprint and also reduces the amount of noise and congestion on the roads.
As this point, you have basically two choices. The first choice is that you can swerve to avoid the door and possibly crash into another car and be seriously injured, or you can try to stop in time, but will likely end up crashing into the open door. None of these choices is a good option. But the occupant of the car didn’t give you any choice.
The 15-year-old boy was seriously injured when the brakes failed on a bike he had been fixing, and he crashed into a window. He was unable to stop when the brakes failed, so he put his arms out in front of him to brace the impact. However, when his hand hit the pane of glass, it shattered, and the boy when flying through the window. 



eeds were met.